This is Not Investment Advice

I rarely comment on investments here. There are too many SEC rules that could get me in hot water. Still, I thought the above chart is a fine commentary on why most individuals and many professionals make for lousy investors. They are always chasing yesterday's winner.
The graphs breaks the U.S. stock market into size quintiles with quintile 1 being the smallest U.S. companies (as measured by market capitalization) and quintile 5 being the biggest U.S. companies.
Then for each quintile, I plotted the price earnings ratio based on estimated earnings over the next twelve months. The price earnings ratio represents what investors are willing to pay for one dollar worth of earnings.
Back in March 2000 when we were living in a new paradigm and the Internet was going to solve all the world's problems, investors were willing to pay $40 for each dollar of earnings for the biggest companies in the U.S. The twisted logic at the time was the biggest companies had the resources to take advantage of the new paradigm including the ability to use their expensive stock to make acquisitions. Meanwhile, small companies were unloved one trick ponies who couldn't compete with the big boys.
Of course, the conventional wisdom was wrong and large company stocks have underperformed small cap stocks for the past seven years.
Now the unloved stocks are the biggest companies in the U.S., which are 67% cheaper than they were in 2000 while the smallest stocks are 11% more expensive.
It is only a matter of time before the present trend reverses and the biggest companies will outperform smaller ones.
